<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Law Firm Web StrategyLaw Firm Web Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/category/legalweb20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog</link>
	<description>by Steve Matthews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:58:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>LegalWeb2.0: Doug Cornelius on Face-Blocking</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/legalweb20-doug-cornelius-on-face-blocking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/legalweb20-doug-cornelius-on-face-blocking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Matthews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Web Demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LegalWeb2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The second edition of Law Practice Magazine&#8216;s LegalWeb2.0 column is now online. This month, Doug Cornelius has authored a great roundup of the issues faced by law firms who block internal access to social media websites. His article, titled Online Social Networking: Is It a Productivity Bust or Boon for Law Firms? covers a broad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stemlegal.com%2Fstrategyblog%2F2009%2Flegalweb20-doug-cornelius-on-face-blocking%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stemlegal.com%2Fstrategyblog%2F2009%2Flegalweb20-doug-cornelius-on-face-blocking%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>The second edition of <a href="http://www.abanet.org/lpm/magazine/home.shtml">Law Practice Magazine</a>&#8216;s LegalWeb2.0 column is now online. This month, <a href="http://dougcornelius.com/about/"><strong>Doug Cornelius</strong></a> has authored a great roundup of the issues faced by law firms who block internal access to social media websites. His article, titled <a href="http://www.abanet.org/lpm/magazine/articles/v35/is2/pg28.shtml">Online Social Networking: Is It a Productivity Bust or Boon for Law Firms?</a> covers a broad range of issues, from productivity and virus exposure to bandwidth and brand monitoring.</p>
<p>A couple of additional notes I&#8217;d like to mention:</p>
<ul>
<li>First, there&#8217;s a nice <a href="http://www.abanet.org/lpm/magazine/webonly.shtml">web-only appendix</a> on the magazine website that includes the comments received from the survey. I&#8217;m not sure how long this page will be available, so best to drop by this month.</li>
<li>Second, a feature only blogging &amp; the social web could provide, Doug has just posted his <a href="http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/03/10/online-social-networking-is-it-a-productivity-bust-or-boon/">response to the survey process &amp; the results</a>. He also has a sample <a href="http://dougcornelius.com/2008/11/blogging-social-internet-policy-for-a-law-firm/">social networking/blogging policy</a> for a law firm.  Both these items are worth checking out.</li>
<li>Third, a big thanks goes out to <a href="http://www.abovethelaw.com/2008/12/non-sequiturs_122308.php">David Lat and Above the Law</a> for helping us get the word out about the survey.  ATL didn&#8217;t get a mention in the article, and that was an oversight. Chalk it up to the rookie column editor (me).</li>
<li>Fourth, <strong>we can&#8217;t pin this on Big Law</strong>. The numbers were consistent across firms of all sizes. We segmented the results to isolate each of the firm size demographics, and the numbers were almost identical.</li>
<li>Fifth, <strong>45% of law firms blocking social networks </strong>surprises me, and also doesn&#8217;t surprise me. The sample size was admittedly pretty small, but the fact the percentages were so consistent across firm size gives me a bit more faith in the results. Even if that number drops to 33%, one-third of an industry blocking is still a big number.</li>
</ul>
<p>Many thanks to Doug for putting this together. I&#8217;d like to encourage everyone to check out <a href="http://www.abanet.org/lpm/magazine/articles/v35/is2/pg28.shtml">Doug&#8217;s article</a> and review the materials noted above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/legalweb20-doug-cornelius-on-face-blocking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Your Law Firm Face-block? Take this Survey!</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/does-your-law-firm-face-block-take-this-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/does-your-law-firm-face-block-take-this-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Matthews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LegalWeb2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Related to my last post, Legal web2.0 guru Doug Cornelius (he&#8217;ll hate that I&#8217;m calling him a guru) and I are conducting a survey for an upcoming LegalWeb2.0 column. We&#8217;re trying to gather some intelligence about the practice of blocking social media websites by law firms. That is, you try to visit the Facebook&#8217;s, LinkedIn&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stemlegal.com%2Fstrategyblog%2F2008%2Fdoes-your-law-firm-face-block-take-this-survey%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stemlegal.com%2Fstrategyblog%2F2008%2Fdoes-your-law-firm-face-block-take-this-survey%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>Related to my <a href="http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/legalweb20-coming-to-abas-law-practice/">last post</a>, Legal web2.0 guru <a href="http://kmspace.blogspot.com/">Doug Cornelius</a> (he&#8217;ll hate that I&#8217;m calling him a guru) and I are conducting a survey for an upcoming LegalWeb2.0 column. We&#8217;re trying to gather some intelligence about the practice of blocking social media websites by law firms. That is, you try to visit the Facebook&#8217;s, LinkedIn&#8217;s and Twitter&#8217;s of the world, and you get a big old <strong>access denied</strong> message.</p>
<p>Now, there are plenty of reasons for and against this practice, and that&#8217;s what will be addressed in the upcoming article. But before we get that far, we want you to tell us (<a href="http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/survey-intro.zgi?p=WEB228MF4TTDKR"><strong>anonymously, using this survey</strong></a>) if your firm is blocking, which sites are being blocked, and if you are in favour or against the practice.</p>
<p><em>Any help in spreading the word would be greatly appreciated!</em> Especially if you know someone, say at another firm, is being blocked. They might not ever know about this survey, unless a kind friend discreetly emailed them <a href="http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/survey-intro.zgi?p=WEB228MF4TTDKR">this link</a>. Would they? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/does-your-law-firm-face-block-take-this-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LegalWEB2.0 Coming to ABA&#8217;s Law Practice</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/legalweb20-coming-to-abas-law-practice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/legalweb20-coming-to-abas-law-practice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Matthews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LegalWeb2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stem Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Soon to be unveiled in the upcoming issue of the ABA LPM&#8217;s Law Practice magazine will be LegalWEB2.0, a new column to be edited by yours truly.  I&#8217;ve included a small image capture below to pique your interest! If you care to squint, you can probably get a sneak peak at the into blurb from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stemlegal.com%2Fstrategyblog%2F2008%2Flegalweb20-coming-to-abas-law-practice%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stemlegal.com%2Fstrategyblog%2F2008%2Flegalweb20-coming-to-abas-law-practice%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>Soon to be unveiled in the upcoming issue of the <a href="http://www.abanet.org/lpm/magazine/home.shtml">ABA LPM&#8217;s Law Practice magazine</a> will be LegalWEB2.0, a new column to be edited by yours truly.  I&#8217;ve included a small image capture below to pique your interest! If you care to squint, you can probably get a sneak peak at the into blurb from the first article, written by PMA extraordinaire <a href="http://lawpracticematters.com/">Erik Mazzone</a>!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/legalweb2.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-116" title="legalweb2" src="http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/legalweb2.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="274" /></a></p>
<p>The focus of this new column will be on the practical aspects of web innovation within the legal community. My role, or at least as I see it, will be to track down stories (and authors) that highlight the latest methods of web engagement. The <em>read write web</em> is an environment that&#8217;s constantly evolving, both on the public-Internet and within law firms. My hope, is that this column will help lawyers decide which tactics &amp; technologies are valuable investments of their time, and which are not.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very excited to be expanding my role with Law Practice in 2009.  I&#8217;m also thankful to have the mentoring and guidance of Editor-in-Chief <a href="http://www.practicepro.ca/">Dan Pinnington</a>, as well as <a href="http://www.abanet.org/lpm/magazine/mag_masthead.shtml">Joan Feldman and Joy White</a>.  All three have been incredibly helpful, and I feel confident going forward knowing that I have their support.</p>
<p>And while I&#8217;m on the thank-you circuit&#8230; I&#8217;d also like to acknowledge former Editor-in-Chief <a href="http://www.thoughtfullaw.com/">Dave Bilinsky</a>, who both got me involved in LPM and persuaded me to sign up for (yet) another volunteer gig. Thanks Dave! ;) Actually, all sarcasm aside, my time with LPM has been an exceptional experience.  It&#8217;s a extremely smart and fun group to be around. And I highly <a href="http://www.abanet.org/lpm/membership.shtml">recommend it</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/legalweb20-coming-to-abas-law-practice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
