<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Law Firm Web StrategyLaw Firm Web Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/category/legalweb20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog</link>
	<description>by Steve Matthews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:22:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Stem client Clio announces major private equity investment</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2012/stem-client-clio-announces-major-private-equity-investment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2012/stem-client-clio-announces-major-private-equity-investment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Furlong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LegalWeb2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stem Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=2218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Big news is breaking at <a href="http://www.legaltechshow.com/r5/cob_page.asp?category_code=ltech">Legal Tech New York</a> today, and we’re especially proud here at Stem Legal because it involves one of our clients, <a href="http://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a>. <a href="http://www.goclio.com/about/">Jack Newton, Rian Gauvreau and friends</a> have just announced that Clio&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big news is breaking at <a href="http://www.legaltechshow.com/r5/cob_page.asp?category_code=ltech">Legal Tech New York</a> today, and we’re especially proud here at Stem Legal because it involves one of our clients, <a href="http://www.goclio.com/">Clio</a>. <a href="http://www.goclio.com/about/">Jack Newton, Rian Gauvreau and friends</a> have just announced that Clio has raised $6 million in its Series B round of financing from <a href="http://www.actoncapital.de/">Acton Capital Partners</a>, a Munich-based growth equity investor, and a series of existing investors that includes <a href="http://www.pointninecap.com/">Point Nine Capital</a>.</p>
<p>This is a major deal, and not just for Clio, which will use the funding to extend its product leadership, develop new functions, and support and expand its customer base beyond the United States. This is a powerful vote of confidence for the entire cloud-based legal services area, from law practice management providers like Clio to the growing number of virtual law practices and online legal collaborators. It demonstrates the seriousness with which outside investors view the extraordinary potential of this burgeoning field.</p>
<p>Boris Wertz, Acton Capital’s Vancouver-based Venture Partner, makes a telling point in Clio’s press release announcing the investment. “The legal space is ripe for disruption,” he says, adding that although the legal industry has been more a laggard than a leader when it comes to the adoption of technological innovations, that’s now changing. Clio’s cloud computing success is just one illustration, albeit an important one, of that emerging reality.</p>
<p>If you’re interested in learning more about this announcement, check out<a href="http://www.goclio.com/blog/"> Clio’s blog</a> today for the latest news. On behalf of everyone here at Stem, our sincere congratulations to Clio on this breakthrough funding announcement!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2012/stem-client-clio-announces-major-private-equity-investment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LegalWeb2.0: Doug Cornelius on Face-Blocking</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/legalweb20-doug-cornelius-on-face-blocking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/legalweb20-doug-cornelius-on-face-blocking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Matthews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Web Demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LegalWeb2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The second edition of <a href="http://www.abanet.org/lpm/magazine/home.shtml">Law Practice Magazine</a>&#8216;s LegalWeb2.0 column is now online. This month, <a href="http://dougcornelius.com/about/"><strong>Doug Cornelius</strong></a> has authored a great roundup of the issues faced by law firms who block internal access to social media websites. His article,&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second edition of <a href="http://www.abanet.org/lpm/magazine/home.shtml">Law Practice Magazine</a>&#8216;s LegalWeb2.0 column is now online. This month, <a href="http://dougcornelius.com/about/"><strong>Doug Cornelius</strong></a> has authored a great roundup of the issues faced by law firms who block internal access to social media websites. His article, titled <a href="http://www.abanet.org/lpm/magazine/articles/v35/is2/pg28.shtml">Online Social Networking: Is It a Productivity Bust or Boon for Law Firms?</a> covers a broad range of issues, from productivity and virus exposure to bandwidth and brand monitoring.</p>
<p>A couple of additional notes I&#8217;d like to mention:</p>
<ul>
<li>First, there&#8217;s a nice <a href="http://www.abanet.org/lpm/magazine/webonly.shtml">web-only appendix</a> on the magazine website that includes the comments received from the survey. I&#8217;m not sure how long this page will be available, so best to drop by this month.</li>
<li>Second, a feature only blogging &amp; the social web could provide, Doug has just posted his <a href="http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/03/10/online-social-networking-is-it-a-productivity-bust-or-boon/">response to the survey process &amp; the results</a>. He also has a sample <a href="http://dougcornelius.com/2008/11/blogging-social-internet-policy-for-a-law-firm/">social networking/blogging policy</a> for a law firm.  Both these items are worth checking out.</li>
<li>Third, a big thanks goes out to <a href="http://www.abovethelaw.com/2008/12/non-sequiturs_122308.php">David Lat and Above the Law</a> for helping us get the word out about the survey.  ATL didn&#8217;t get a mention in the article, and that was an oversight. Chalk it up to the rookie column editor (me).</li>
<li>Fourth, <strong>we can&#8217;t pin this on Big Law</strong>. The numbers were consistent across firms of all sizes. We segmented the results to isolate each of the firm size demographics, and the numbers were almost identical.</li>
<li>Fifth, <strong>45% of law firms blocking social networks </strong>surprises me, and also doesn&#8217;t surprise me. The sample size was admittedly pretty small, but the fact the percentages were so consistent across firm size gives me a bit more faith in the results. Even if that number drops to 33%, one-third of an industry blocking is still a big number.</li>
</ul>
<p>Many thanks to Doug for putting this together. I&#8217;d like to encourage everyone to check out <a href="http://www.abanet.org/lpm/magazine/articles/v35/is2/pg28.shtml">Doug&#8217;s article</a> and review the materials noted above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/legalweb20-doug-cornelius-on-face-blocking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Your Law Firm Face-block? Take this Survey!</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/does-your-law-firm-face-block-take-this-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/does-your-law-firm-face-block-take-this-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Matthews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LegalWeb2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Related to my <a href="http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/legalweb20-coming-to-abas-law-practice/">last post</a>, Legal web2.0 guru <a href="http://kmspace.blogspot.com/">Doug Cornelius</a> (he&#8217;ll hate that I&#8217;m calling him a guru) and I are conducting a survey for an upcoming LegalWeb2.0 column. We&#8217;re trying to gather some intelligence about the practice&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Related to my <a href="http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/legalweb20-coming-to-abas-law-practice/">last post</a>, Legal web2.0 guru <a href="http://kmspace.blogspot.com/">Doug Cornelius</a> (he&#8217;ll hate that I&#8217;m calling him a guru) and I are conducting a survey for an upcoming LegalWeb2.0 column. We&#8217;re trying to gather some intelligence about the practice of blocking social media websites by law firms. That is, you try to visit the Facebook&#8217;s, LinkedIn&#8217;s and Twitter&#8217;s of the world, and you get a big old <strong>access denied</strong> message.</p>
<p>Now, there are plenty of reasons for and against this practice, and that&#8217;s what will be addressed in the upcoming article. But before we get that far, we want you to tell us (<a href="http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/survey-intro.zgi?p=WEB228MF4TTDKR"><strong>anonymously, using this survey</strong></a>) if your firm is blocking, which sites are being blocked, and if you are in favour or against the practice.</p>
<p><em>Any help in spreading the word would be greatly appreciated!</em> Especially if you know someone, say at another firm, is being blocked. They might not ever know about this survey, unless a kind friend discreetly emailed them <a href="http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/survey-intro.zgi?p=WEB228MF4TTDKR">this link</a>. Would they? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/does-your-law-firm-face-block-take-this-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LegalWEB2.0 Coming to ABA&#8217;s Law Practice</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/legalweb20-coming-to-abas-law-practice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/legalweb20-coming-to-abas-law-practice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Matthews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LegalWeb2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stem Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Soon to be unveiled in the upcoming issue of the <a href="http://www.abanet.org/lpm/magazine/home.shtml">ABA LPM&#8217;s Law Practice magazine</a> will be LegalWEB2.0, a new column to be edited by yours truly.  I&#8217;ve included a small image capture below to pique your interest! If&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soon to be unveiled in the upcoming issue of the <a href="http://www.abanet.org/lpm/magazine/home.shtml">ABA LPM&#8217;s Law Practice magazine</a> will be LegalWEB2.0, a new column to be edited by yours truly.  I&#8217;ve included a small image capture below to pique your interest! If you care to squint, you can probably get a sneak peak at the into blurb from the first article, written by PMA extraordinaire <a href="http://lawpracticematters.com/">Erik Mazzone</a>!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/legalweb2.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-116" title="legalweb2" src="http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/legalweb2.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="274" /></a></p>
<p>The focus of this new column will be on the practical aspects of web innovation within the legal community. My role, or at least as I see it, will be to track down stories (and authors) that highlight the latest methods of web engagement. The <em>read write web</em> is an environment that&#8217;s constantly evolving, both on the public-Internet and within law firms. My hope, is that this column will help lawyers decide which tactics &amp; technologies are valuable investments of their time, and which are not.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very excited to be expanding my role with Law Practice in 2009.  I&#8217;m also thankful to have the mentoring and guidance of Editor-in-Chief <a href="http://www.practicepro.ca/">Dan Pinnington</a>, as well as <a href="http://www.abanet.org/lpm/magazine/mag_masthead.shtml">Joan Feldman and Joy White</a>.  All three have been incredibly helpful, and I feel confident going forward knowing that I have their support.</p>
<p>And while I&#8217;m on the thank-you circuit&#8230; I&#8217;d also like to acknowledge former Editor-in-Chief <a href="http://www.thoughtfullaw.com/">Dave Bilinsky</a>, who both got me involved in LPM and persuaded me to sign up for (yet) another volunteer gig. Thanks Dave! ;) Actually, all sarcasm aside, my time with LPM has been an exceptional experience.  It&#8217;s a extremely smart and fun group to be around. And I highly <a href="http://www.abanet.org/lpm/membership.shtml">recommend it</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/legalweb20-coming-to-abas-law-practice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

