<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LexisNexis says TCO for SaaS 22% Less</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/lexisnexis-says-tco-for-saas-22-less/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/lexisnexis-says-tco-for-saas-22-less/</link>
	<description>by Steve Matthews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:43:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/lexisnexis-says-tco-for-saas-22-less/comment-page-1/#comment-1402</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=155#comment-1402</guid>
		<description>Theresa,

I would go with Clio or AdvologixPM. Clio is cheaper and simplier, while Advologix is more feature rich, but a bit pricier. Advologix is built on the force.com platform.

Rocketmatter and LawRd are two others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theresa,</p>
<p>I would go with Clio or AdvologixPM. Clio is cheaper and simplier, while Advologix is more feature rich, but a bit pricier. Advologix is built on the force.com platform.</p>
<p>Rocketmatter and LawRd are two others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/lexisnexis-says-tco-for-saas-22-less/comment-page-1/#comment-1391</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=155#comment-1391</guid>
		<description>Theresa: The fact that SaaS services are web based should remove OS comparability as an issue. Mac/Safari users shouldn&#039;t have a problem with any of the industry providers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theresa: The fact that SaaS services are web based should remove OS comparability as an issue. Mac/Safari users shouldn&#8217;t have a problem with any of the industry providers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa Blackwood</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/lexisnexis-says-tco-for-saas-22-less/comment-page-1/#comment-1390</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa Blackwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=155#comment-1390</guid>
		<description>Can you suggest a stable, comprehensive, law firm practice management SasS package that works well in an all Mac firm?

THANKS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you suggest a stable, comprehensive, law firm practice management SasS package that works well in an all Mac firm?</p>
<p>THANKS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/lexisnexis-says-tco-for-saas-22-less/comment-page-1/#comment-1225</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=155#comment-1225</guid>
		<description>That is great. Not suprising at all. 

In response to the previous comment, I have used NetDocuments. Still do. It is great. 

I think google is right by saying that soon our only program will be our web browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is great. Not suprising at all. </p>
<p>In response to the previous comment, I have used NetDocuments. Still do. It is great. </p>
<p>I think google is right by saying that soon our only program will be our web browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonard Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/lexisnexis-says-tco-for-saas-22-less/comment-page-1/#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=155#comment-1222</guid>
		<description>Steve: those of us who live in the SaaS world and have serviced law firms welcome your perspective and coverage of this release by Lexis. To confirm what you are stating, NetDocuments has had large firms using SaaS-based DMS for years now, including Dorsey &amp; Whitney, Kutak Rock, Lewis Brisbois, etc. all over 1000 users.  There is also a difference if &quot;web-based&quot; and SaaS and I question if Interaction is truly &quot;SaaS&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve: those of us who live in the SaaS world and have serviced law firms welcome your perspective and coverage of this release by Lexis. To confirm what you are stating, NetDocuments has had large firms using SaaS-based DMS for years now, including Dorsey &amp; Whitney, Kutak Rock, Lewis Brisbois, etc. all over 1000 users.  There is also a difference if &#8220;web-based&#8221; and SaaS and I question if Interaction is truly &#8220;SaaS&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

