<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawyers, journalists and trust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/lawyers-journalists-and-trust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/lawyers-journalists-and-trust/</link>
	<description>by Steve Matthews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:03:59 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Furlong</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/lawyers-journalists-and-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-1515</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Furlong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=387#comment-1515</guid>
		<description>Tim, my reasoning for disclosing is tied to the overall theme: trust. If I&#039;m building a relationship with a reporter but I feel compelled to cover my bases by recording the conversation, then I want to be open with that. If my remarks as reported aren&#039;t as they were recorded, springing the recording on the reporter (and her editor) to prove my point has a &quot;gotcha&quot; feel to it and ensures, to my mind anyway, that that relationship is toast: the journalist will never feel entirely secure with me again.

Possibly the reporter will feel insulted if I tell her I&#039;m recording our talk for accuracy; if so, I&#039;d try to explain that my firm has instituted this policy for all media interviews, and that it&#039;s meant neither as a slight nor as an aspersion cast on her integrity. But if the reporter is miffed, she&#039;s miffed; better that, to my mind, then starting off what I hope will be a mutually beneficial relationship by taking a serious measure like recording a phone conversation without being upfront about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, my reasoning for disclosing is tied to the overall theme: trust. If I&#8217;m building a relationship with a reporter but I feel compelled to cover my bases by recording the conversation, then I want to be open with that. If my remarks as reported aren&#8217;t as they were recorded, springing the recording on the reporter (and her editor) to prove my point has a &#8220;gotcha&#8221; feel to it and ensures, to my mind anyway, that that relationship is toast: the journalist will never feel entirely secure with me again.</p>
<p>Possibly the reporter will feel insulted if I tell her I&#8217;m recording our talk for accuracy; if so, I&#8217;d try to explain that my firm has instituted this policy for all media interviews, and that it&#8217;s meant neither as a slight nor as an aspersion cast on her integrity. But if the reporter is miffed, she&#8217;s miffed; better that, to my mind, then starting off what I hope will be a mutually beneficial relationship by taking a serious measure like recording a phone conversation without being upfront about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhilFeed &#8250; Fresh From My Twitter / Favorites from PhilBaumann today</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/lawyers-journalists-and-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-1514</link>
		<dc:creator>PhilFeed &#8250; Fresh From My Twitter / Favorites from PhilBaumann today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=387#comment-1514</guid>
		<description>[...] Lawyers, journalists and trust. 5 tips for working with the media for law firms. (@jordan_law21) http://bit.ly/4nm8RV Powered by Fresh From   This was written by Phil. Posted on Thursday, November 12, 2009, at 2:45 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lawyers, journalists and trust. 5 tips for working with the media for law firms. (@jordan_law21) <a href="http://bit.ly/4nm8RV" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4nm8RV</a> Powered by Fresh From   This was written by Phil. Posted on Thursday, November 12, 2009, at 2:45 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2009/lawyers-journalists-and-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-1509</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=387#comment-1509</guid>
		<description>Why should you have to tell someone you are recording a conversation? If you are using it for broadcasting purposes, you should, and must, tell them, of course. And if you they ask, then yes, do tell. But if you are doing it only for the purpose of accuracy, why do you have to volunteer the information? Reporters record conversations without volunteering that information all the time - lawyers should be able to as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should you have to tell someone you are recording a conversation? If you are using it for broadcasting purposes, you should, and must, tell them, of course. And if you they ask, then yes, do tell. But if you are doing it only for the purpose of accuracy, why do you have to volunteer the information? Reporters record conversations without volunteering that information all the time &#8211; lawyers should be able to as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
