<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quoted on CNN Money, Dow Jones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/quoted-on-cnn-money-dow-jones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/quoted-on-cnn-money-dow-jones/</link>
	<description>by Steve Matthews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:03:59 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Canton</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/quoted-on-cnn-money-dow-jones/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>David Canton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=90#comment-599</guid>
		<description>For the most part, my encounters with journalists have been positive and similar to your experience.  Most understand when you decline to comment on an area that is a bit outside your expertise.  Sometimes I scratch my head on the bits they publish about the conversation we had, but there was only one time I felt burned.  A journalist called me because I had written a newspaper article on a recent happening in a legal area that I do not practice in - my article was about a web based angle to it.  I emphasized more than once to the journalist that I did not practice in X law, and that my expertise and commentary was about the web aspects.  The journalist acknowledged that he understoood that. But when the article came out, it described me as an expert in X law.  I was not amused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part, my encounters with journalists have been positive and similar to your experience.  Most understand when you decline to comment on an area that is a bit outside your expertise.  Sometimes I scratch my head on the bits they publish about the conversation we had, but there was only one time I felt burned.  A journalist called me because I had written a newspaper article on a recent happening in a legal area that I do not practice in &#8211; my article was about a web based angle to it.  I emphasized more than once to the journalist that I did not practice in X law, and that my expertise and commentary was about the web aspects.  The journalist acknowledged that he understoood that. But when the article came out, it described me as an expert in X law.  I was not amused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Bodine Law Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/quoted-on-cnn-money-dow-jones/comment-page-1/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Bodine Law Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=90#comment-593</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Slaps FindLaw In Effort to Crack Down On &#039;Link Juice&#039;...&lt;/strong&gt;

The Web&#039;s No. 1 search engine has charged FindLaw with the shady tactic of selling Web links -- a.k.a. selling &quot;link juice,&quot; designed to boost a Web site&#039;s search engine rankings -- such as the law firms that are FindLaw......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Slaps FindLaw In Effort to Crack Down On &#8216;Link Juice&#8217;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The Web&#8217;s No. 1 search engine has charged FindLaw with the shady tactic of selling Web links &#8212; a.k.a. selling &quot;link juice,&quot; designed to boost a Web site&#8217;s search engine rankings &#8212; such as the law firms that are FindLaw&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Lurssen</title>
		<link>http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/2008/quoted-on-cnn-money-dow-jones/comment-page-1/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Lurssen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stemlegal.com/strategyblog/?p=90#comment-592</guid>
		<description>Terrific. Congrats, Steve.

And your media insight is spot on. Glad you posted your thoughts here.

Adrian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrific. Congrats, Steve.</p>
<p>And your media insight is spot on. Glad you posted your thoughts here.</p>
<p>Adrian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
